Skip to content
Lease Detect

A finished portfolio, opened up

What you actually get, on five sites

This is a worked portfolio with invented figures: five leases, five landlords, five deadlines, read and priced the way yours would be. Nothing here is masked, because the point is to show the whole thing before you send us anything.

Theoretical gross$20,763.00Every finding at face value, before any weighting. It is the largest honest number and it is never the one to plan on.
Expected recovery$16,713.30The same findings weighted by grade: provable from the lease and the statement, likely and turning on a record we have asked for, or needing a document nobody has yet.
Soonest window8 daysThe nearest objection deadline across the five sites. It is never masked, on any report, because a hidden deadline is one that passes.

The five sites, as the dashboard shows them

SiteShare billedFindings and gradeTheoretical grossWindowHow we act
Site 1, suburban strip centre4.12%Pro-rata denominator definition (A); Management fee base and percentage (A); Lease exclusion list (B)$5,923.0023 days leftWe act, paid from what comes back
Site 2, power centre pad6.9%Capital expensed as operating (A); HVAC: repair versus unit replacement (B)$6,843.0041 days leftWe act, paid from what comes back
Site 3, grocery-anchored centre3.55%Controllable cap arithmetic (A); Marketing fund, promotional charges and landlord contribution (B)$2,882.008 days leftWe act, paid from what comes back
Site 4, enclosed mall inline1.98%Gross-up of fixed costs or wrong threshold (B); Administrative fee stacking (A)$2,431.0055 days leftWe act, priced flat
Site 5, office park suite7.42%Base year deflation and category mismatch (B)$2,684.0017 days leftYou send, we prepare

Three sites we can act on, one priced flat, one you send yourself

The split is decided by each audit clause, not by us. On 3 of these sites the clause permits a representative and does not bar a contingency, so we act and are paid from what comes back. On 1 the clause bars that, so the same work is priced before it starts. On 1 the clause will not take a representative at all, so you send what we prepare and everything else stays the same: the findings, the computations, the deadline tracking and the dashboard. Telling you which sites we cannot take is the part that makes the rest worth believing.

Every figure traces to a clause and a line

Behind each finding sits the lease clause with its page, the statement line with its amount, and the computation between them, in that order. That is what a landlord pushes back against, what your auditor asks for, and what your lender accepts. A number a model guessed at is not a number you can put your name on, so no figure in a report is produced by one: language models read the documents and label the charges, fixed code computes every amount.

Illustration, not an average. The landlords, the centres, the amounts and the deadlines on this page are invented, and no client data appears anywhere on it. The arithmetic between them is the arithmetic the product runs.

What you actually get, on five sites